PROFUSE CONSULTANTS / PRACTICAL GUIDE

How to compare software vendor proposals fairly

Align scope before comparing prices. A practical guide from Profuse Consultants.

PRACTICAL GUIDE

Align scope before comparing prices.

Write down the required business outcome

Begin with workflows, users, locations, integrations and constraints. A proposal that solves a different version of the problem cannot be fairly compared on its headline price.

Normalise the cost categories

Separate recurring licences from implementation, data migration, integration, training, support, internal effort and future changes. Mark omitted costs as unknown, not zero. Record the period used for the comparison.

Expose the assumptions inside each quote

Check who supplies clean data, who owns integrations, how customisations are handled and what constitutes completed delivery. These assumptions can shift work and cost back to your team.

Ask vendors to demonstrate the same scenarios

A common set of realistic scenarios is more informative than unrelated sales demonstrations. Define what evidence would support a claim of fit, and identify which issues require a technical assessment or pilot.

Compare exit and operating responsibilities

Understand data export, support coverage, renewal terms, change requests and what happens if a partner or product is replaced. The ongoing relationship is part of the selection decision.

A COMMON QUESTION

Should the cheapest software proposal win?

Price should be assessed alongside scope, fit, implementation responsibilities and ongoing costs. A lower quotation may cover less work or shift more responsibility to the client.

YOUR NEXT MOVE STARTS HERE

What is waiting
to move forward?

Bring us the question. We will help define the work.

Tell us what you have in mind